🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Reconsider Case

The federal appeals court decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger panel of 11 judges. The court also overturned a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the latest development in a long-running legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and justification to send state military units in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that municipal police have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as a conflict zone, locals have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two legal injunctions this period – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in the state, after attempts to circumvent the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”